Audi, Lamborghini, Porsche and Bugatti parts: cross-reference examples

Audi and Lamborghini have documented applications for several of the same supplier service parts. Certain Porsche and Bentley applications provide further examples. Those catalog entries can widen the set of quotes you request for a rebuild, provided you preserve the exact product, application and equipment restrictions.

Bugatti needs a different evidence label here. A historical manufacturer-authored document contains a reference also found in an indexed Audi parts entry, but this research does not establish a current Bugatti-to-Audi purchasing substitution. Keep that lead separate from the supplier-catalog examples below.

Which Lamborghini and Audi examples can you actually research?

The table records specific MANN-FILTER service products checked on October 24, 2026. These are supplier-branded replacement applications. It does not establish that MANN made the original factory part, that every genuine version is identical or that one vehicle brand's box can replace another's without checking.

Sources: CUK 3023-2, HU 7005 x, CU 31 003 UK, CU 31 003 US and CUK 2641. An open production end date in a catalog is not confirmation of every later vehicle or continuing production today.

How would you use the Gallardo and R8 example?

Start with the actual Gallardo's VIN and the current vehicle-brand part reference supplied for it. Use the MANN entry to ask a supplier about the complete CUK 3023-2 set and the applicable vehicle row. Obtain a quote for the required quantity and contents.

The number creates another search route without requiring a search engine to recognize the word Lamborghini. You can also ask an Audi parts provider to investigate the recorded OE reference. That provider still needs to establish what it would supply and whether its proposed genuine item is appropriate for the recipient vehicle.

Do not quote the price of one loose filter against a set of two. Do not compare a plain particulate product with an activated-carbon set and describe the whole gap as a badge markup. Confirm filter type, set contents and fit before comparing totals.

Why is the Huracán engine number important?

The retained UK HU 7005 x entry limits the LP 610-4 row to engine CEH003541 onward. A description that says only “Huracán oil filter” loses that boundary. Give the number to the supplier and ask how the car's actual engine and service reference are established.

The catalog also lists other model rows, each with its own scope. Their presence does not remove the LP 610-4 qualification. A shared V10 description or a similar-looking element is not evidence that an earlier engine accepts the same replacement.

For a rebuild budget, retain the confirmed filter, seals and quantity in the parts list. Oil specification, repair scope and any other work remain separate questions for the repairer. This example does not turn an oil-filter cross-reference into a shared-engine parts list.

Does the Urus example also cover Porsche?

The same CU 31 003 article and GTIN appear in two regional MANN catalogs. The UK page supplies the Urus application; the US page supplies the retained 2019 Cayenne Hybrid DCBE and Cayenne Turbo rows, along with a 2019 Q7 CREC row. That supports the stated supplier-product connection while keeping the markets separate.

It does not establish a match for every model, year or heating-and-ventilation configuration. The regional OE lists also differ: the UK page includes suffix C on one reference while the retained US list does not. Preserve the number actually supplied for your VIN rather than merging every regional reference into one asserted supersession.

Use this as a reason to obtain a supplier quote and inspect the current catalog entry. Do not assume the rest of the SUVs' components follow the same pattern.

What is the Bugatti-to-Audi evidence?

A publicly mirrored copy of Bugatti's 2014-model-year emissions application lists coolant-temperature references 06A 919 501 A and 059.919.501.A under Veyron in section 21.02, printed section page 3, PDF page 65. Its cover identifies the model year and test group EBGTV08.0V16.

An indexed Audi storefront entry uses reference 059919501A. Importantly, it explicitly excludes the particular 2015 A4 configuration in that page's URL. The URL or search headline is not a fitment answer even on an official parts storefront.

This is a historical reference-overlap lead. The Bugatti document was read on a third-party mirror, not an independently checked current Bugatti service catalog or original regulator host. The Audi entry was available through indexed content; its direct fetch was blocked. Neither establishes a current VIN match, permitted supersession, complete package, stock or installation requirement for a Bugatti.

The useful next step is specific: ask Bugatti's parts provider to confirm the current reference for the vehicle and whether an alternative supply route is supported. Do not substitute either listed coolant sensor for the other, or infer a Chiron application from this Veyron document. No Bugatti saving is quantified from this lead.

How do you know whether the alternative saves money?

Obtain comparable written quotes after resolving the fitment question. Keep the exact article, package quantity, condition, seller, currency, destination, delivery, tax and any required fitting work aligned. Record whether a price is an actual available offer, a list price or a historical reference.

Where the current genuine reference and a supplier replacement are both suitable, the quote difference becomes a real purchasing question. A common catalog entry alone supplies no price advantage, and a large advertised discount does not establish a completed saving.

Keep the original part-number evidence with the repair plan when browsing project vehicles. These examples are most useful before committing to a project whose budget depends on an expensive or difficult-to-source component.

Related reading: compare complete supplier quotes.